Skip to content
HomeTurbine Blade Thermomechanical Fatigue Optimization
Engineering Case Study

Turbine Blade Thermomechanical Fatigue Optimization

Reduced component weight while maintaining safety margins.

Turbine Blade Thermomechanical Fatigue Optimization
Client IndustryAerospace
Software UsedANSYS Mechanical
Analysis TypeThermo-Structural
Timeline Duration6 Weeks
The Problem

Vibration-Induced Fatigue at Piping Branch Junctions

A major chemical processor encountered premature mechanical failures at critical branch welds of their high-pressure fluid manifold. Pulsating flow caused two upstream pumps to induce complex, cyclic fluid-dynamic loads and critical structural stress concentrations.

Vibration-Induced Fatigue at Piping Branch Junctions
Systematic Methodology

The Multi-Step Simulation Workflow

A coupled fluid-structure workflow connected transient pressure loading with structural response and fatigue assessment.

01

Fluid Domain CFD

High-fidelity transient CFD simulation in ANSYS Fluent to model pulsating pressure waves and turbulence structures.

02

Pressure Mapping

Time-varying pressure profiles mapped from the fluid boundary directly onto the structural FEA surface grid.

03

Structural FEA

Static and transient structural models calculate deformation, cyclic strain, and peak von Mises stresses.

04

Fatigue Estimation

S-N curves and weld classifications predict system fatigue life limits at hot-spot weld lines.

Simulation Overview

Overview

This section outlines the core assumptions, meshing strategy, and solver settings used to simulate flow-induced stress. The goal is to provide a clear, readable record of the methodology—making it easier to reproduce results and validate the model.

Meshing & Discretization

The mesh was generated using a hexahedral core strategy with localized refinement at weld fillets and interface junctions. This approach balances computational cost with boundary layer resolution, ensuring that the first-layer cell height is controlled to achieve a y+ value of ~1.

Key metrics
Total cell count: 12.4 million elements. The mesh is designed to support transient simulations with minimal numerical diffusion while maintaining a stable CFL condition.

Turbulence & Physics

The simulation employs the SST k-omega turbulence model with curvature correction. The PISO pressure-velocity coupling scheme is selected for stable transient formulation, and the time-step size is restricted to 1e-4 seconds to capture higher-order pressure harmonics.

Boundary conditions

Fixed piping support constraints are applied at anchor points matching physical structural hangers. A cyclic time-series pressure load is mapped dynamically using spatial interpolation to capture localized structural deflection.

Fatigue Evaluation

High-cycle fatigue evaluation is performed based on the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section VIII Div 2. Multi-axial fatigue is resolved using the Goodman relation and Rainflow cycle counting algorithms.

Post-processing

Results are extracted for key locations and summarized in a fatigue damage report. This includes stress cycles, usage factors, and critical locations identified by the solver.

Thermal and structural coupling reduced risk while trimming weight.

Success Metrics

Engineering Performance & Field Validation

38%

Stress Reduction

Peak von Mises weld stresses at critical branch connections decreased safely below structural thresholds.

4.2x

Fatigue Life Improvement

Calculated life cycles under continuous pressure pulsations exceeded the target design requirement.

< 5%

Field Measurement Match

Accelerometers placed on actual operational piping validated simulated harmonic vibration frequencies.

Ready to Accelerate Your Engineering Innovation?

Partner with Digiwise Innovations for world-class simulation expertise and advanced computational engineering solutions.